Finite Element Analysis of Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Cranial Implant Manufactured with PMMA and PEEK: A Mechanical Comparative Study

Freddy P. Moncayo-Matute; Efrén Vázquez-Silva; Pablo G. Peña-Tapia; Paúl B. Torres-Jara; Diana P. Moya-Loaiza; Tony J. Viloria-Ávila

doi:10.3390/polym15173620

Finite Element Analysis of Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Cranial Implant Manufactured with PMMA and PEEK: A Mechanical Comparative Study

Freddy P. Moncayo-Matute, Efrén Vázquez-Silva, Pablo G. Peña-Tapia, Paúl B. Torres-Jara, Diana P. Moya-Loaiza, Tony J. Viloria-Ávila

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article reports on a patient who required a cranial protection system. Using additive manufacturing techniques and surgical planning with the help of bio-models, a patient-specific bone implant solution was proposed that allows aesthetic restoration of the affected area and provides an adequate level of protection. In addition, through a comparative analysis with finite elements, the mechanical response to external actions of the medical device, printed with two materials: polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK), is simulated. The tested materials have recognized biocompatibility properties, but their costs on the market differ significantly. The results obtained demonstrate the similarities in the responses of both materials. It offers the possibility that low-income people can access these devices, guaranteeing adequate biomechanical safety, considering that PMMA is a much cheaper material than PEEK.

Original language	English
Article number	3620
Journal	Polymers
Volume	15
Issue number	17
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15173620
State	Published - Sep 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The work was carried out under the auspices of research projects, Development of customized bone implants with reduction of the affected area through the use of surgical guides and additive manufacturing. Phase I: development of the comprehensive methodology. and Development of customized bone implants with reduction of the affected area through the use of surgical guides and additive manufacturing. Phase II: additive manufacturing with PEEK and PEKK, and evaluation of a superficial modification of the implant, financed by the Salesian Polytechnic University. Approving resolutions: RESOLUTION No.002-003-2020-07-15 and RESOLUTION No005-005-2023-05-25, respectively.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 by the authors.

Keywords

custom medical device
finite element analysis
polyether-ether-ketone
polymethylmethacrylate

Access to Document

10.3390/polym15173620

Cite this

@article{0ec7a607237046aab7be8f73e76792d1,

title = "Finite Element Analysis of Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Cranial Implant Manufactured with PMMA and PEEK: A Mechanical Comparative Study",

abstract = "This article reports on a patient who required a cranial protection system. Using additive manufacturing techniques and surgical planning with the help of bio-models, a patient-specific bone implant solution was proposed that allows aesthetic restoration of the affected area and provides an adequate level of protection. In addition, through a comparative analysis with finite elements, the mechanical response to external actions of the medical device, printed with two materials: polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK), is simulated. The tested materials have recognized biocompatibility properties, but their costs on the market differ significantly. The results obtained demonstrate the similarities in the responses of both materials. It offers the possibility that low-income people can access these devices, guaranteeing adequate biomechanical safety, considering that PMMA is a much cheaper material than PEEK.",

keywords = "custom medical device, finite element analysis, polyether-ether-ketone, polymethylmethacrylate",

author = "Moncayo-Matute, {Freddy P.} and Efr{\'e}n V{\'a}zquez-Silva and Pe{\~n}a-Tapia, {Pablo G.} and Torres-Jara, {Pa{\'u}l B.} and Moya-Loaiza, {Diana P.} and Viloria-{\'A}vila, {Tony J.}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2023 by the authors.",

year = "2023",

month = sep,

doi = "10.3390/polym15173620",

language = "English",

volume = "15",

journal = "Polymers",

issn = "2073-4360",

publisher = "MDPI AG",

number = "17",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Finite Element Analysis of Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Cranial Implant Manufactured with PMMA and PEEK

T2 - A Mechanical Comparative Study

AU - Moncayo-Matute, Freddy P.

AU - Vázquez-Silva, Efrén

AU - Peña-Tapia, Pablo G.

AU - Torres-Jara, Paúl B.

AU - Moya-Loaiza, Diana P.

AU - Viloria-Ávila, Tony J.

PY - 2023/9

Y1 - 2023/9

N2 - This article reports on a patient who required a cranial protection system. Using additive manufacturing techniques and surgical planning with the help of bio-models, a patient-specific bone implant solution was proposed that allows aesthetic restoration of the affected area and provides an adequate level of protection. In addition, through a comparative analysis with finite elements, the mechanical response to external actions of the medical device, printed with two materials: polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK), is simulated. The tested materials have recognized biocompatibility properties, but their costs on the market differ significantly. The results obtained demonstrate the similarities in the responses of both materials. It offers the possibility that low-income people can access these devices, guaranteeing adequate biomechanical safety, considering that PMMA is a much cheaper material than PEEK.

AB - This article reports on a patient who required a cranial protection system. Using additive manufacturing techniques and surgical planning with the help of bio-models, a patient-specific bone implant solution was proposed that allows aesthetic restoration of the affected area and provides an adequate level of protection. In addition, through a comparative analysis with finite elements, the mechanical response to external actions of the medical device, printed with two materials: polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) and polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK), is simulated. The tested materials have recognized biocompatibility properties, but their costs on the market differ significantly. The results obtained demonstrate the similarities in the responses of both materials. It offers the possibility that low-income people can access these devices, guaranteeing adequate biomechanical safety, considering that PMMA is a much cheaper material than PEEK.

KW - custom medical device

KW - finite element analysis

KW - polyether-ether-ketone

KW - polymethylmethacrylate

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85170382972&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/polym15173620

DO - 10.3390/polym15173620

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85170382972

SN - 2073-4360

VL - 15

JO - Polymers

JF - Polymers

IS - 17

M1 - 3620

ER -

Finite Element Analysis of Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Cranial Implant Manufactured with PMMA and PEEK: A Mechanical Comparative Study

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this