Métodos de censura en regímenes autocráticos intermedios: Estudio de caso de países iberoamericanos 2000-2016

Luis M. Romero-Rodríguez; Angel Torres-Toukoumidis; Ignacio Aguaded

Métodos de censura en regímenes autocráticos intermedios: Estudio de caso de países iberoamericanos 2000-2016

Luis M. Romero-Rodríguez
, Angel Torres-Toukoumidis
, Ignacio Aguaded

Grupo de Investigación Game Lab-UPS (GAME LAB)

Producción científica: Contribución a una revista › Artículo › revisión exhaustiva

1 Cita (Scopus)

Resumen

This study aims to classify and analyze censorship methods most commonly used in intermediate autocratic regimes in Iberoamerican countries through a qualitative research related to extreme cases samples. It concludes that countries with less freedom of information are Venezuela, Honduras, Colombia and Guatemala and the most common methods of indirect censorship are: 1) Murders and climate of impunity; 2) Granting discretionary institutional advertising; 3) Intimidation and attacks against the media and journalists; 4) Legal prosecution against journalists and media.

Título traducido de la contribución	Methods of censorship in intermedium autocratic regimes: Case study of Iberoamerican countries 2000-2016
Idioma original	Español
Páginas (desde-hasta)	455-478
Número de páginas	24
Publicación	Espacios
Volumen	38
N.º	28
Estado	Publicada - 1 ene. 2017

Nota bibliográfica

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 revistaESPACIOS.com.

ODS de las Naciones Unidas

Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

ODS 13: Acción por el clima
ODS 16: Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidas

Otros archivos y enlaces

https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85020907745

Citar esto

@article{a40f832ac05043138254920538f5e4cc,

title = "M{\'e}todos de censura en reg{\'i}menes autocr{\'a}ticos intermedios: Estudio de caso de pa{\'i}ses iberoamericanos 2000-2016",

abstract = "This study aims to classify and analyze censorship methods most commonly used in intermediate autocratic regimes in Iberoamerican countries through a qualitative research related to extreme cases samples. It concludes that countries with less freedom of information are Venezuela, Honduras, Colombia and Guatemala and the most common methods of indirect censorship are: 1) Murders and climate of impunity; 2) Granting discretionary institutional advertising; 3) Intimidation and attacks against the media and journalists; 4) Legal prosecution against journalists and media.",

author = "Romero-Rodr{\'i}guez, \{Luis M.\} and Angel Torres-Toukoumidis and Ignacio Aguaded",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017 revistaESPACIOS.com.",

year = "2017",

month = jan,

day = "1",

language = "Espa{\~n}ol",

volume = "38",

pages = "455--478",

journal = "Espacios",

issn = "0798-1015",

publisher = "Revista Espacios",

number = "28",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Métodos de censura en regímenes autocráticos intermedios

T2 - Estudio de caso de países iberoamericanos 2000-2016

AU - Romero-Rodríguez, Luis M.

AU - Torres-Toukoumidis, Angel

AU - Aguaded, Ignacio

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - This study aims to classify and analyze censorship methods most commonly used in intermediate autocratic regimes in Iberoamerican countries through a qualitative research related to extreme cases samples. It concludes that countries with less freedom of information are Venezuela, Honduras, Colombia and Guatemala and the most common methods of indirect censorship are: 1) Murders and climate of impunity; 2) Granting discretionary institutional advertising; 3) Intimidation and attacks against the media and journalists; 4) Legal prosecution against journalists and media.

AB - This study aims to classify and analyze censorship methods most commonly used in intermediate autocratic regimes in Iberoamerican countries through a qualitative research related to extreme cases samples. It concludes that countries with less freedom of information are Venezuela, Honduras, Colombia and Guatemala and the most common methods of indirect censorship are: 1) Murders and climate of impunity; 2) Granting discretionary institutional advertising; 3) Intimidation and attacks against the media and journalists; 4) Legal prosecution against journalists and media.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85020907745

M3 - Artículo

AN - SCOPUS:85020907745

SN - 0798-1015

VL - 38

SP - 455

EP - 478

JO - Espacios

JF - Espacios

IS - 28

ER -