Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The political use and depolarizing role of Facebook, Twitter, and WhatsApp in Ecuador’s 2021 National elections

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

This study evaluates the political uses of Facebook, Twitter, and WhatsApp platforms in the context of the 2021 presidential and parliamentary elections in Ecuador and explores their relationship with individual political polarization. It highlights that the political scenario studied offers a complex situation, characterized by a great distrust of citizens toward political management during the COVID-19 pandemic, accompanied by a context of economic, social, and electoral crisis, all of which generated processes of extreme division of public opinion. This chapter has two main objectives: (a) to comparatively analyze the political use of Facebook, Twitter, and WhatsApp platforms in the context of the national elections in Ecuador in 2021 and (b) to explore the relationship between different types of political behavior in social networks and political polarization. We find that political uses focused on maintaining contact with politically oriented groups, as well as interpersonal political mobilization, are inversely associated with political polarization, suggesting that political use of social media contributes to a depolarizing effect of individual political opinion. Thus, this result contradicts some of the literature that supports the polarizing impact of social media on the political spectrum. Therefore, the implications of the presented empirical results are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationElections and Social Networks around the World
PublisherTaylor and Francis Ltd.
Pages335-351
Number of pages17
ISBN (Electronic)9781040185827
ISBN (Print)9781032572307
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 selection and editorial matter, Erica Guevara and Anaïs Theviot; individual chapters, the contributors.

CACES Knowledge Areas

  • 213A Political Science

Cite this