Abstract
Traditional manufacturing processes yield plastic containers in large batches, even for minimal production runs, resulting in elevated production costs. Three-dimensional printing has emerged as a viable alternative for very low production volumes, offering properties comparable to traditional methods at significantly reduced costs. To assess the tensile strength, specimens printed with identical geometric parameters to the 3D-printed containers were tested according to ASTM D638 standards, enabling the determination of the stress–strain curve behavior. A compression test was conducted on containers obtained from both manufacturing processes to establish their respective resistance and deformation characteristics. The results revealed a 67% difference in resistance, indicating greater rigidity in the 3D-printed container, and a higher deformation in the blow-molded container, reaching up to 4 mm in height without fracture. Similarly, impact resistance was analyzed using finite element analysis with Ls-Dyna software, showing deformation differences of 0.91% and stress differences of 2.15%. Therefore, 3D printing presents itself as a compelling alternative for the fabrication of plastic containers in small production runs.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 204 |
| Journal | Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2025 by the authors.
Keywords
- 3D printing
- compression
- containers
- deformation
- finite elements
- impact
- resistance
- stress
CACES Knowledge Areas
- 727A Industrial and process design
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Resistance Analysis of a Plastic Container Obtained with Additive Manufacturing Using Finite Elements'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver