Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Matrix Factorization-Based Clustering for Sparse Data in Recommender Systems: A Comparative Study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Clustering techniques significantly enhance recommender systems by improving predictive accuracy and interpretability, particularly in sparse, high-dimensional datasets. This research presents a comprehensive comparative analysis of traditional clustering methods such as K-means and Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) against advanced probabilistic clustering methodologies based on Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF), focusing specifically on Bayesian NMF. Experiments conducted using the widely recognized MovieLens 1M dataset reveal Bayesian NMF’s superior performance in terms of predictive accuracy, intra-cluster cohesion, and interpretability compared to classical methods. The study systematically evaluates the influence of key parameters such as overlap ((Formula presented.)) and evidence threshold ((Formula presented.)) in Bayesian NMF, demonstrating that careful parameter tuning substantially improves recommendation quality. The results highlight the inherent trade-off between cluster cohesion and predictive accuracy, emphasizing the flexibility and robustness of probabilistic approaches in accurately modeling user preferences and behaviors. The paper concludes by proposing future directions, including the exploration of hybrid clustering methods, dynamic adaptation to evolving user preferences, and integration of contextual information, thereby fostering continued advances in personalized-recommendation research.

Original languageEnglish
Article number213
JournalComputation
Volume13
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 by the authors.

Keywords

  • clustering
  • matrix factorization
  • recommender systems

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Matrix Factorization-Based Clustering for Sparse Data in Recommender Systems: A Comparative Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this