Comparación de AMQP y CoAP para la integración de las comunicaciones en el área de producción

Translated title of the contribution: Evaluation of AMQP and CoAP Protocols for Shopfloor communication integration

Gustavo Caiza, Edison Alvarez-M, Edisson Remache, Alexandra Ortiz, Marcelo V. Garcia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Due industries need speed and impact on their systems, the implementation of control networks based on the Internet of Things (IoT) will allow field-mounted devices and sensors to be connected, as well as control devices directly to the cloud. This article compares conventional IoT communication protocols; CoAP and AMQP, in an automated system, using low-cost devices such as Raspberry Pi boards. The results show that CoAP is designed for embedded systems, however, it does not provide a satisfactory communication speed, while AMQP is more complex, has no official support and needs large installation packages; But it provides faster communication speed.

Translated title of the contributionEvaluation of AMQP and CoAP Protocols for Shopfloor communication integration
Original languageSpanish
Pages (from-to)652-666
Number of pages15
JournalRISTI - Revista Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao
Volume2020
Issue numberE26
StatePublished - Feb 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Los autores agradecen a la Universidad T?cnica de Ambato (UTA) y a la Direcci?n de Investigaci?n y Desarrollo (DIDE) por su apoyo en la realizaci?n del proyecto ?Metodolog?as para el dise?o de Fog Computing y controladores Inteligentes basados en IEC 61499?.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Associacao Iberica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informacao. All rights reserved.

Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evaluation of AMQP and CoAP Protocols for Shopfloor communication integration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this