Deontología En Emergencias Médicas. Análisis Comparativo Entre Medicina Pública Y Medicina Privada

Translated title of the contribution: Deontology In Medical Emergencies. Comparative Analysis Between Public Medicine and Private Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In Ecuador, the systems of emergency medical services (SSEM) have been constantly criticized, public servants who have compared private servers maintain patient care differently, even though the deontology applied to SSEMs should be the same. This document compares the principles of bioethics and their application in public and private SSEMs. These principles are among the most fruitful for building the foundations of intercultural bioethics. After recalling the principles of bioethics, as defended by Tom L. Beauchamp and James F. Childress in the United States, I offer a brief look at the evolution of SEMs in Ecuador's constitution. I continue with a reflection on these principles. All this in order to socialize the bases of what we could call an intercultural bioethics in the SEM of Ecuador.
Translated title of the contributionDeontology In Medical Emergencies. Comparative Analysis Between Public Medicine and Private Medicine
Original languageSpanish (Ecuador)
JournalRevista Caribeña De Las Ciencias Sociales
Volume2019
Issue number5
StatePublished - 30 May 2019

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Deontology In Medical Emergencies. Comparative Analysis Between Public Medicine and Private Medicine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this