Deontología en Emergencias Médicas. Análisis Comparativo Entre Medicina Pública y Medicina Privada

Translated title of the contribution: Deontology in Medical Emergencies. Comparative Analysis Between Public Medicine and Private Medicine

Jorge Luis Pincha Andrango, Jeverson Santiago Quishpe Gaibor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In Ecuador, emergency medical services systems (EMS) have been constantly criticized, public servants who, compared to private servants, provide care to patients in a different way, even though the deontology applied to EMS should be the same. In this paper, a comparison of the principles of bioethics and their application in public and private SSEM, these principles are among the most fruitful to build the foundations of an intercultural bioethics. After recalling what the principles of bioethics consist of, as they have been defended by Tom L. Beauchamp and James F. Childress in the United States, I offer a brief look at the evolution of the SEMs in the constitution of Ecuador. I continue with a reflection on these principles. All this in order to socialize the bases of what we could call an intercultural bioethics in the SEMs of Ecuador.
Translated title of the contributionDeontology in Medical Emergencies. Comparative Analysis Between Public Medicine and Private Medicine
Original languageSpanish (Ecuador)
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalRevista Caribeña De Ciencias Sociales
Volume2019
Issue number2019
StatePublished - 30 May 2019

Keywords

  • Ethics
  • Medical emergencies
  • Patient
  • Private
  • Public
  • Services

CACES Knowledge Areas

  • 819A Public Health

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Deontology in Medical Emergencies. Comparative Analysis Between Public Medicine and Private Medicine'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this